张智明¹， 张昊昱¹， 王嘉博²， 王毅刚¹

1.同济大学 汽车与能源学院， 上海 201804； 2.西安科技大学 创新创业学院， 陕西 西安 710054

引用格式：

张智明， 张昊昱， 王嘉博， 等. 微米级碳化硅颗粒形貌分选实验及有效粒径阈值分析［J］. 中国粉体技术， 2026， 32（5）： 173-185.

Zhang Zhiming， Zhang Haoyu， Wang Jiabo， et al. Experimental study on morphological sorting of micron-sized silicon carbide particles and analysis of its limitations［J］. China Powder Science and Technology， 2026， 32（5）： 173-185.

DOI：10.13732/j.issn.1008-5548.2026.05.015

收稿日期： 2026-04-20， 修回日期： 2026-08-13， 上线日期： 2026-08-28。

基金项目： 国家重点研发计划，编号：2024YFB4007402。

第一作者： 张智明（1979—），男，副教授，博士，博士生导师，研究方向为新能源汽车。E-mail：zhangzm@tongji.edu.cn。

摘要： 【目的】 为了解决碳化硅微细颗粒形貌分选的工艺瓶颈，明确微细尺度下有效形貌分选的临界失效界限为核心目标，阐明微观界面力对宏观分选行为的干扰规律，从而为突破更小尺度颗粒的分选瓶颈提供的理论支撑。 【方法】 采取理论解析、数值仿真与实验验证相结合的研究手段。首先，从理论层面解析微观界面力对微细颗粒动力学行为的干扰规律；其次，采用离散元方法结合约翰逊-肯德尔-罗伯茨微观接触力学模型与摩擦起电模型，构建逼近真实工况的仿真体系，重点探讨粒径分别为100、80、60、40 μm时不同形貌碳化硅颗粒的受力机制演变，精确捕捉不规则颗粒在板面跳动过程中的随机侧向游走特性；随后，依托多自由度可调振动平台开展系统对照分选实验，验证仿真边界的可靠性；最后，基于仿真计算结果，深入剖析现行简谐振动板形貌分选方法的工艺局限性与失效边界。 【结果】 实验与仿真结果高度吻合，表明平板振动这种选型方式的有效分选临界失效粒径阈值均为60 μm，当颗粒尺度小于该临界值时，由微观比表面积激增带来的范德华力，以及高频碰撞积累的库仑静电力急剧跃升，此时这2种微观黏附力的合力在量级上远超由设备激振加速度提供的宏观惯性力，导致颗粒与筛板间的法向和切向阻力呈指数级放大，颗粒间团聚现象显著增加。 【结论】 底层受力机制由宏观惯性力主导向微观黏附力主导的根本性逆转，是导致细微碳化硅颗粒彻底丧失三维空间翻转与高频弹跳自由度的根本原因；现有的常规纯机械振动设备无法有效实现粒径小于60 μm的超细粉体的形貌分选；研究揭示了平板振动分选机制及其物理局限性。

关键词： 形貌分选； 平板振动分形； 碳化硅颗粒； 颗粒振动学； 范德华力

Abstract

Objective The primary engineering bottlenecks and core goals of this study are outlined. Silicon carbide （SiC）， as a representative third-generation semiconductor material， has been widely applied in modern new energy vehicles， high-frequency systems， and high-performance power electronics due to its superior physical and chemical properties. However， the electrical consistency， switching characteristics， and thermal reliability of SiC-based devices are strictly restricted by the morphological irregularities and inherent defects of raw powder particles during manufacturing. Therefore， high-precision and efficient morphological sorting of micron-scale powders is recognized as a critical link in the semiconductor manufacturing chain. While conventional sorting technologies have achieved success in particle size classification above 100 μm， specialized techniques for pure morphological sorting remain scarce and inefficient. As particle sizes scale down to the micro-level， the dominant mechanical regime transitions from macroscopic gravity and inertial forces to microscopic interfacial adhesion forces， leading to uncontrollable particle agglomeration and unexpected dynamic behavior. Therefore， this study aims to explicitly identify the critical physical failure boundary for effective morphological sorting under micro-scale conditions. The interference mechanisms and patterns of micro-scale interfacial forces on macroscopic sorting behavior are systematically elucidated. Solid theoretical support and a scientific pathway are provided for overcoming the technical bottlenecks in sorting even finer particles， thereby avoiding empirical trial-and-error and minimizing the development cycle in engineering practice.

Methods To investigate the mechanical limitations of morphological separation， a comprehensive methodology combining theoretical derivation， discrete element method （DEM） simulation， and experimental verification was adopted. First， a theoretical framework for particle vibrational dynamics on an inclined plate was established. The spatial Lissajous trajectories， harmonic excitation forces， and instantaneous accelerations delivered by the vibrating substrate were analytically resolved under a near-resonance frequency. The three orthogonal excitation components were configured with specific amplitudes and corresponding maximum directional accelerations along the three axes. The translational and rotational states of the particles were governed by Newton-Euler equations. Second， a high-fidelity DEM simulation system replicating actual working conditions was constructed. The Johnson-Kendall-Roberts （JKR） contact mechanics model was coupled with a triboelectric charging model and a classical electrostatic model to precisely capture micro-scale interfacial contact forces and particle cohesion. Third， ideal spherical particles and elongated particles—reconstructed via a multi-sphere clump method with specified aspect ratios and typical micro-scale diameters—were modeled to differentiate their motion trajectories. The background cell grid sizes were optimized to resolve the computational bottlenecks of large-scale simulations. To ensure numerical stability， the fixed simulation time step was restricted to a small fraction of the Rayleigh time step over a predetermined total duration， thereby accumulating a sufficient number of iterations. Fourth， system verification experiments were performed using a multi-degree-of-freedom adjustable flat-plate vibrating classifier. Multiple distinct particle size groups covering the micro-scale range were tested at the designated excitation frequency. The feeding smoothness and spatial distribution of the powders on the plate were recorded and compared with the simulation datasets. Finally， theoretical failure criterion inequalities for normal， longitudinal， and transverse motions were derived by incorporating a peeling reduction coefficient， the Hamaker constant， and the surface charge density to evaluate the exact boundary mathematically.

Results and Discussion A high degree of consistency was observed between the experimental results and the numerical simulation results， validating the reliability of the established boundary parameters. For the 100 μm and 80 μm particle groups， highly effective morphological sorting was achieved. The feeding stream exhibited a continuous fluid-like state without visible agglomeration， and a distinct fan-like scattering pattern was formed on the plate surface. Due to high geometric symmetry， the spherical particles experienced minimal eccentric torque， causing them to slide stably along the maximum longitudinal slope. Conversely， the elongated particles generated intense non-central collisions， which triggered violent three-dimensional flipping and random transverse jumping， forcing them to migrate toward the lateral wings of the plate. For the 60 μm particle size group， the morphological sorting capacity failed completely. The initial projectile trajectories of the elongated particles were abruptly truncated， and a collective co-directional slide movement was observed. The micro-scale van der Waals forces and the high-frequency contact-induced Coulomb electrostatic forces escalated rapidly， surpassing the macroscopic inertial detachment forces. Consequently， the individual dynamic characteristics of different morphologies were completely obscured， and particles were locked onto the substrate， forming dense wave-like profiles. For the 40 μm particle size group， an extreme state of microscopic force locking occurred. The feeding channel was severely clogged， and a permanent， irreversible solid-like powder adhesion layer was deposited on the plate surface， which could not be broken even by maximizing the vibration amplitude. Ultimately， the critical physical threshold for effective separation was determined to be a particle diameter of 60 μm， which exceeded the internationally recognized dry mesh screening limit by 20%. The derived theoretical formula yielded a normal failure threshold diameter of 60.56 μm， which perfectly matched the experimental and numerical results.

Conclusion Several critical conclusions are drawn regarding the physical limitations of dry mechanical sorting systems. First， the root cause of morphological separation failure and severe powder agglomeration in ultra-fine SiC particles is identified as the fundamental reversal of the underlying mechanical regime. The dominant forces transition from macroscopic gravitational and inertial forces to microscopic interfacial adhesion forces （van der Waals and electrostatic interactions）. This transition deprives fine particles of their degrees of freedom for three-dimensional rotation and high-frequency vertical bouncing. Second， a definitive engineering boundary for conventional pure harmonic flat-plate vibrating classifiers is established at a critical particle diameter threshold of 60 μm. This study shows that any attempt to separate ultra-fine powders below 60 μm utilizing pure mechanical vibration faces an insurmountable physical barrier. Third， it is demonstrated that merely increasing the mechanical excitation intensity is ineffective for overcoming microscopic interfacial adhesion forces. Instead， such adjustments amplify high-frequency friction， which accelerates triboelectric charge accumulation and intensifies powder agglomeration. Finally， these findings successfully reveal the underlying physical mechanisms and physical limitations of plate vibration methods， providing a solid theoretical reference and a scientific framework for guiding the transition from traditional mechanical vibration to advanced multi-field coupled micropowder sorting technologies.

Keywords： morphological sorting； flat-plate vibrating classifier； silicon carbide particle； particle vibrational dynamics； van der Waals forcen

参考文献（References）

［1］张伟先， 文午. 第三代半导体材料在机车控制电源上的应用研究［J］. 技术与市场， 2018， 25（2）： 40-41.

Zhang Weixian， Wen Wu. Research on the application of third-generation semiconductor materials in locomotive control power supplies［J］. Technology and Market， 2018， 25（2）： 40-41.

［2］Ma Caocong， Tian Yihong. Design and implementation of a SiC-based VRFB power conditioning system［J］. Micromachines，2020， 11（12）： 1099

［3］Chabi S， Kadel K. Two-dimensional silicon carbide： emerging direct band gap semiconductor［J］. Nanomaterials， 2020， 10（11）： 2226.

［4］Jia Hujun， Dong Mengyu， Wang Xiaowei， et al. A novel 4H-SiC MESFET with a heavily doped region， a lightly doped region and an insulated region［J］. Micromachines， 2021， 12（5）： 488.

［5］Eswaraiah C， Angadi S I， Mishra B K. Mechanism of particle separation and analysis of fish-hook phenomenon in a circulating air classifier［J］. Powder Technology， 2012， 218： 57-63.

［6］Sun Zhanpeng， Liang Longlong， Liu Chunyu， et al. Structural optimization of vortex finder for a centrifugal air classifier［J］. Chemical Engineering Research and Design， 2021， 166： 220-226.

［7］刘克润. 涡流空气分级机流场中颗粒运动特性研究［D］. 北京：北京化工大学， 2024： 1-76.

Liu Kerun. A study on the particle motion characteristics in the flow field of a vortex air classifier［D］. Beijing：Beijing University of Chemical Technology， 2024： 1-76.

［8］Sun Zhanpeng， Sun Guogang， Liu Jianxin， et al. CFD simulation and optimization of the flow field in horizontal turbo air classifiers［J］. Advanced Powder Technology， 2017， 28（6）： 1474-1485.

［9］Yan Hongwei， Li Yajie， Yuan Fei， et al. Analysis of the screening accuracy of a linear vibrating screen with a multi-layer screen mesh［J］. Strojniški Vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2020， 66（5）： 289-299.

［10］谭扬. 选矿振动筛机械结构优化与运行性能分析［J］. 中国机械， 2025（31）： 86-89.

Tan Yang. Optimization of the mechanical structure and analysis of the operational performance of mineral processing vibrating screens［J］. China Machinery， 2025（31）： 86-89.

［11］王星宇， 赵环帅. 振动筛智能制造技术的研究进展［J］. 智能制造， 2024（5）： 37-41.

Wang Xingyu， Zhao Huanshuai. Research progress on smart manufacturing technologies for vibrating screens［J］. Smart Manufacturing， 2024（5）： 37-41.

［12］Ogonowski S， Krauze P. Trajectory control for vibrating screen with magnetorheological dampers［J］. Sensors， 2022， 22（11）： 4225.

［13］赵开乐， 贾延强， 张文谱， 等. 某硫钴混合精矿原浆浮选分离试验研究［J］. 金属矿山， 2026（3）： 116-122.

Zhao Kaile， Jia Yanqiang， Zhang Wenpi， et al. Experimental study on flotation separation of raw slurry from a certain mixed cobalt-sulfur concentrate［J］. Metal Mine， 2026（3）： 116-122.

［14］Cole M J， Galvin K P， Dickinson J E. Maximizing recovery， grade and throughput in a single stage reflux flotation cell［J］. Minerals Engineering， 2021， 163： 106761.

［15］Liu Chang， Xu Longhua， Deng Jiushuai， et al. A review of flotation reagents for bastnäsite-（Ce） rare earth ore［J］. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science， 2023， 321： 103029.

［16］郭利成， 吴佳斌， 熊尚发， 等. 基于静水沉降法的沉积物颗粒分选流程［J］. 地球科学与环境学报， 2016， 38（5）： 694-699.

Guo Licheng， Wu Jiabin， Xiong Shangfa， et al. New sedimentary particle sorting process based on hydrostatic sedimentation method［J］. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment， 2016， 38（5）： 694-699.

［17］Chernova E V， Chernov D V. Current status and application of fine screening technology in China［C］//IOP Conference Series： Earth and Environmental Science. 2017， 87（2）： 022005.

［18］Li Zhanfu， Tong Xin， Zhou Bi， et al. Design and efficiency research of a new composite vibrating screen［J］. Shock and Vibration， 2018， 2018： 1293273.

［19］Yang Huarui， Ma Xuedong. Research on the screening mechanisms of composite vibrating screens based on discrete elements［J］. PLoS One， 2023， 18（10）： e0293205.

［20］Israelachvili J N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces［M］. 3rd ed. San Diego： Academic Press， 2011.

［21］Cleary P W， Wilson P， Sinnott M D. Effect of particle cohesion on flow and separation in industrial vibrating screens［J］. Minerals Engineering， 2018， 119： 191-204.

［22］Rajupet S， Riet A A， Chen Qizan， et al. Relative importance of electrostatic and van der Waals forces in particle adhesion to rough conducting surfaces［J］. Physical Review E， 2021， 103（4）： 042906.

［23］Rajupet S， Sow M， Lacks D J. Particle adhesion to rough surfaces［J］. Physical Review E， 2020， 102（1）： 012904.

［24］Persson B N J. The dependency of adhesion and friction on electrostatic attraction［J］. The Journal of Chemical Physics， 2018， 148（14）： 144701.

［25］Rabinovich Y I， Adler J J， Ata A， et al. Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces I： role of asperity geometry［J］. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science， 2000， 232（1）： 10-16.

［26］ Zhou Hongben， Götzinger M， Peukert W. The influence of particle charge and roughness on particle-substrate adhesion［J］. Powder Technology， 2003， 135-136： 82-91.

［27］Zhu H P， Zhou Z Y， Yang R Y， et al. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems： theoretical developments［J］. Chemical Engineering Science， 2007， 62（13）： 3378-3396.

［28］Kruggel-Emden H， Elskamp F. Modeling of screening processes with the discrete element method involving non-spherical particles［J］. Chemical Engineering & Technology， 2014， 37（5）： 847-856.

［29］Li Yujia， Zhao Peng， Mo Li， et al. Numerical simulation of particle screening efficiency of large multi-layer vibrating screen based on discrete element method［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part E： Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering， 2021： 095440892110606.

［30］闻邦椿， 刘树英， 张纯宇. 机械振动学［M］. 2版. 北京： 冶金工业出版社， 2011： 45-62.

Wen Bangchun， Liu Shuying， Zhang Chunyu. Mechanical vibration［M］. 2nd ed. Beijing： Metallurgical Industry Press， 2011： 45-62

［31］Thomson W T. Theory of vibration with applications［M］. Boca Raton： CRC Press， 2018.

［32］International Organization for Standardization. Representation of results of particle size analysis： Part 6： Descriptive and quantitative representation of particle shape and morphology： ISO 9276-6： 2008［S］. ISO， 2008

［33］Cundall P A， Strack O D L. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies［J］. Géotechnique， 1979， 29（1）： 47-65.

［34］Johnson K L， Kendall K， Roberts A D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids［J］. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences， 1971， 324（1558）： 301-313.

［35］Harper W R. Contact and frictional electrification［M］. Oxford： Oxford University Press， 1967.

［36］Hamaker H C. The London-van der Waals attraction between spherical particles［J］. Physica， 1937， 4（10）： 1058-1072.

［37］Matsusaka S， Maruyama H， Matsuyama T， et al. Triboelectric charging of powders： a review［J］. Chemical Engineering Science， 2010， 65（22）： 5781-5807.