ISSN 1008-5548

CN 37-1316/TU

最新出版

氧化石墨烯强化环氧树脂及类玻璃高分子的结构性能Structure and properties of graphene oxide-reinforced epoxy resins and vitrimers

王越1, 顾傲天2, 杨毅1

1. 南京理工大学 环境与生物工程学院,江苏 南京 210094; 2. 泰州学院 化学化工与材料工程学院,江苏 泰州 225300

引用格式:

王越, 顾傲天, 杨毅. 氧化石墨烯强化环氧树脂及类玻璃高分子的结构性能[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2027, 33(1): 1-17.

Wang Yue, Gu Aotian, Yang Yi. Structure and properties of graphene oxide-reinforced epoxy resins and vitrimers[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2027, 33(1): 1-17.

DOI:10.13732/j.issn.1008-5548.2027.01.003

收稿日期: 2026-05-27, 修回日期: 2026-08-27, 上线日期: 2026-09-15。

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目,编号:52470120。

第一作者: 王越(2002—),男,硕士生,研究方向为纳米材料。E-mail:wy1586147@163.com。

通信作者: 杨毅(1973—),男,研究员,博士,博士生导师,江苏省“333工程”、江苏省“六大人才高峰”人才,研究方向为环境功能材料。E-mail:yangyi@njust.edu.cn。

摘要: 【目的】 揭示氧化石墨烯(graphene oxide,GO)形貌与动态共价网络之间的协同增强机制。 【方法】 以化学组成相近但长径比显著不同的商业化长径比小的氧化石墨烯(low-aspect-ratio graphene oxide,GOc)与实验室合成的长径比大的氧化石墨烯(high-aspect-ratio graphene oxide,GOH)为纳米填料,系统考察GO形貌对环氧树脂和类玻璃高分子纳米复合材料结构、热学、电学、力学及应力松弛性能的影响。 【结果】 结构与成分表征表明,类玻璃高分子固化剂中硫原子与GO表面含氧官能团之间的物理极性亲和作用使GO在类玻璃高分子基体中的分散均匀性显著优于环氧树脂基体;GO的引入导致2种基体的玻璃化转变温度因自由体积增加而略有降低,但所有复合材料均保持了低电导率特性;力学性能测试表明,GOc在2种基体中的增强效果均优于GOH,其中GOc使类玻璃高分子和环氧树脂的储能模量分别提升约30%和5%,这与GOc平整厚实的片层形貌所赋予的低团聚特性及高效载荷传递能力密切相关;应力松弛测试进一步证实,GOc-类玻璃高分子复合材料在80、120 ℃下均表现出最快的松弛速率,揭示GOc优异分散性与类玻璃高分子动态共价网络之间的协同增强效应。 【结论】 调控GO形貌是优化动态聚合物纳米复合材料力学与松弛性能的有效策略,为开发可持续高性能热固性纳米复合材料提供实验依据。

关键词: 氧化石墨烯; 类玻璃高分子; 应力松弛; 储能模量; 动态共价网络

Abstract

Objective Epoxy resin (EP) is widely used in aerospace, automotive, electronic packaging, and laminated composite applications due to its mechanical strength, chemical resistance, dimensional stability, and electrical insulation. However, its permanently cross-linked network makes it intrinsically brittle and prevents reshaping or recycling after curing. Covalent adaptable networks (CANs), particularly epoxy-based vitrimers, overcome this limitation by enabling topological rearrangement through reversible bond exchange while maintaining the cross-link density. Graphene oxide (GO) is a widely adopted reinforcement for such networks. However, existing studies have focused almost exclusively on GO loading, and the role of GO sheet morphology in governing the reinforcement of dynamic covalent networks remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to reveal the synergistic reinforcement mechanism between GO morphology and dynamic covalent networks, and to establish morphology engineering as a design parameter for sustainable, reprocessable, high-performance thermosets.

Methods Two GO grades with comparable surface chemistry and lateral dimensions but distinctly different aspect ratios were selected as nanofillers: a commercial low-aspect-ratio graphene oxide (GOc) and a laboratory-synthesized high-aspect-ratio graphene oxide (GOH) prepared using a modified Hummers method. The GO powders were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM) to compare their oxygen-containing functional groups, defect density, lateral dimensions, sheet thickness, and degrees of exfoliation. Four nanocomposites containing 1 wt% filler were then fabricated. For the epoxy system, GO was ultrasonically dispersed in acetone for 30 min and then mixed with Araldite LY564 epoxy under mechanical stirring at 80 ℃ for 18 h. Subsequently, the mixture was combined with Aradur 2 954 hardener at a volume ratio of 100:35, degassed at 60 ℃ for 1 h, and cured at 80 ℃ for 1 h followed by 160 ℃ for 4 h. For the vitrimer system, 4-aminophenyl disulfide was used as the dynamic hardener. The mixture was degassed at 80 ℃ for 1 h and cured at 120 ℃ for 2.5 h, followed by curing at 150 ℃ for 2 h. Unfilled EP and vitrimer controls were prepared following identical procedures. Structure and filler dispersion were assessed by Raman spectroscopy and SEM imaging of cryo-fractured cross-sections. Interfacial chemistry was probed by XPS analysis of the C 1s, O 1s, and S 2p regions. Glass transition temperatures were determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Stress relaxation was measured using the same dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) instrument at 80 ℃ for 100 min and at 120 ℃ for 30 min. Electrical conductivity was obtained using impedance spectroscopy on silver-painted specimens.

Results and Discussion FTIR and Raman results confirmed that GOc and GOH contained equivalent hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups, as well as comparable ID/IG ratios, indicating similar oxidation levels. SEM showed that both grades exhibited lateral dimensions of 5-10 μm, predominantly 6-8 μm. TEM images clearly discriminated between the two morphologies. GOc consisted of flat, multilayer stacks with greater thickness, whereas GOH consisted of thinner, few-layer, strongly wrinkled sheets, indicating that the aspect-ratio difference originated from exfoliation rather than from chemistry. The D and G bands were retained in all four nanocomposites, confirming that GO was incorporated without structural degradation. XPS spectra of the composites showed no chemical shifts relative to the neat matrices, which demonstrated that no new covalent bonds were formed at 1 wt%. Thus, the improved dispersion observed in the vitrimer was attributed to physical polar affinity between the sulfur atoms of the disulfide hardener and the oxygen-containing groups on GO. SEM fractography supported this interpretation: GOc-vitrimer exhibited the most uniform dispersion and the most diffuse filler-matrix interface, while GOH-epoxy showed pronounced agglomerates, sharp interfaces, and voids that served as crack initiation sites. Incorporation of GO lowered Tg in both matrices, from 163 ℃ (DMTA) and 158 ℃ (DSC) for neat EP and from 143 ℃ and 138 ℃ for neat vitrimer. This decrease was attributed to weak filler-polymer interfacial bonding and the additional free volume introduced by GO. All samples remained electrically insulating, with conductivities on the order of 10⁻⁹ S·m⁻¹, because the oxygen-containing groups disrupted the delocalized π-electron system and no percolating network was formed. Mechanically, GOc increased the storage modulus of vitrimer and EP by approximately 30% and 5%, respectively, whereas GOH provided about 20% reinforcement in vitrimer and negligible reinforcement in EP, which was consistent with the lower agglomeration tendency and more efficient load transfer of the flat, thicker GOc sheets. Stress relaxation was markedly faster in vitrimer than in EP at both temperatures owing to disulfide exchange. Among all samples, GOc-vitrimer exhibited the fastest relaxation behavior, revealing a genuine synergy between well-dispersed GOc and the dynamic covalent network.

Conclusion GO morphology is a decisive parameter that governs the overall performance of polymer nanocomposites, while the matrix type further amplifies or suppresses the reinforcement through interfacial affinity and network dynamics. Low-aspect-ratio GOc outperforms high-aspect-ratio GOH in both matrices, and its combination with a disulfide-based vitrimer simultaneously optimizes mechanical stiffness and stress relaxation without compromising electrical insulation. Morphology engineering of GO therefore provides an experimental basis and a practical design route for high-performance, reprocessable, and sustainable thermosetting nanocomposites.

Keywords: graphene oxide; vitrimer; stress relaxation; storage modulus; dynamic covalent networks

参考文献(References)

[1]Zhang Wen, Xu Jun. Advanced lightweight materials for automobiles: a review[J]. Materials & Design, 2022, 221: 110994.

[2]郑凯, 胡杰, 李春琳, 等. 生物基环氧树脂Vitrimer的制备及其闭环回收特性[J]. 聊城大学学报(自然科学版), 2026,39(2): 255-262.

Zheng Kai, Hu Jie, Li Chunlin, et al. Preparation and closed-loop recycling properties of bio-based epoxy Vitrimer[J].Journal of Liaocheng University (Natural Science Edition), 2026, 38(2): 255-262.

[3]孔祥坤, 王璐, 周凯, 等. 二硫化钼表面功能化及其在酚醛树脂中的应用[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2020, 26(1): 29-34.

Kong Xiangkun, Wang Lu, Zhou Kai, et al. Surface functionalization of molybdenum disulfide and its application in phenolic resin[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2020, 26(1): 29-34.

[4]邱天, 卢忠远, 李军, 等. 氢氧化铝粒度及掺量对不饱和聚酯树脂性能的影响[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2014, 20(2): 6-12.

Qiu Tian, Lu Zhongyuan, Li Jun, et al. Effect of particle size and dosage of aluminum hydroxide on performance of unsaturated polyester resin[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2014, 20(2): 6-12.

[5]Tang Hao, Zhou Xiaobai, Liu Xiaolu. Effect of magnesium hydroxide on the flame retardant properties of unsaturated polyester resin[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 52: 336-341.

[6]Gu Hongbo, Tadakamalla S, Zhang Xi, et al. Epoxy resin nanosuspensions and reinforced nanocomposites from polyaniline stabilized multi-walled carbon nanotubes[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2013, 1(4): 729-743.

[7]张兵兵, 洪若瑜. 石墨烯的制备及其在环氧树脂中的应用[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2015, 21(6): 40-42, 51.

Zhang Bingbing, Hong Ruoyu. Preparation of graphene and its application in epoxy[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2015, 21(6): 40-42, 51.

[8]田战战, 徐杨, 王海跃, 等. 环氧树脂增韧改性及其作用机制研究进展[J]. 聊城大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 39(1): 54-63.

Tian Zhanzhan, Xu Yang, Wang Haiyue, et al. Research progress on toughening modification of epoxy resin and its mechanism[J]. Journal of Liaocheng University (Natural Science Edition), 2026, 39(1): 54-63.

[9]Liu Shan, Chevali V S, Xu Zhiguang, et al. A review of extending performance of epoxy resins using carbon nanomaterials[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 136: 197-214.

[10]Panettieri E, Fanteria D, Montemurro M, et al. Low-velocity impact tests on carbon/epoxy composite laminates: a benchmark study[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 107: 9-21.

[11]Haris N I N, Hassan M Z, Ilyas R A, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites: a review[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2022, 19: 167-182.

[12]Veloso-Fernández A, Ruiz-Rubio L, Yugueros I, et al. Improving the recyclability of an epoxy resin through the addition of new biobased vitrimer[J]. Polymers, 2023, 15(18): 3737.

[13]Montarnal D, Capelot M, Tournilhac F, et al. Silica-like malleable materials from permanent organic networks[J]. Science, 2011, 334(6058): 965-968.

[14]Altuna F I, Hoppe C E, Williams R J J. Shape memory epoxy vitrimers based on DGEBA crosslinked with dicarboxylicacids and their blends with citric acid[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(91): 88647-88655.

[15]Zaaba N I, Foo K L, Hashim U, et al. Synthesis of graphene oxide using modified hummers method: solvent influence[J].Procedia Engineering, 2017, 184: 469-477.

[16]Ruiz de Luzuriaga A, Martin R, Markaide N, et al. Epoxy resin with exchangeable disulfide crosslinks to obtain reprocessable, repairable and recyclable fiber-reinforced thermoset composites[J]. Materials Horizons, 2016, 3(3): 241-247.

[17]Malard L M, Pimenta M A, Dresselhaus G, et al. Raman spectroscopy in graphene[J]. Physics Reports, 2009, 473(5/6): 51-87.

[18]Hidalgo P, Salgado L, Ibacache N, et al. Influence of biochar and bio-oil loading on the properties of epoxy resin composites[J]. Polymers, 2023, 15(8): 1895.

[19]Xia Lixin, Wu Shiwei, Wang Jing, et al. Spectral proof for the 4-aminophenyl disulfide plasma assisted catalytic reaction[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 4358.

[20]Zheng Jie, Png Z M, Ng S H, et al. Vitrimers: current research trends and their emerging applications[J]. Materials Today, 2021, 51: 586-625.

[21] Zhou Peng, Tian Feifei, Lv Fenglin, et al. Geometric characteristics of hydrogen bonds involving sulfur atoms in proteins[J]. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2009, 76(1): 151-163.

[22]Young R J, Liu Mufeng, Kinloch I A, et al. The mechanics of reinforcement of polymers by graphene nanoplatelets[J].Composites Science and Technology, 2018, 154: 110-116.

[23]Meyers M A, Chawla K K. Mechanical behavior of materials[M]. 2nd Ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,2008.

[24]Krishnakumar B, Prasanna Sanka R V S, Binder W H, et al. Catalyst free self-healable vitrimer/graphene oxide nanocomposites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 184: 107647.

[25]Torrisi L, Cutroneo M, Torrisi A, et al. Measurements on five characterizing properties of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils[J]. Physica Status Solidi:A, 2022, 219(6): 2100628.

[26]Huntsman Araldite. LY 564-Aradur 2954 data sheet[EB/OL].[2026-05-01]http://https://ecommerce.aviationeu.supplies/en/fluids-other-chemicals/879-huntsman-araldite-epoxy-resinsaradur-curatives-sku-hun-epxsys-aralditearadur.html.

[27]Li Zheling, Young R J, Wilson N R, et al. Effect of the orientation of graphene-based nanoplatelets upon the Young’s modulus of nanocomposites[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2016, 123: 125-133.