张乐^1，2， 赵宁^1，2， 褚浩然^1，2， 郑博文^1，2， 陈运法^3，4

1.中国辐射防护研究院， 山西 太原 030006； 2.山西省核退役治理技术创新中心， 山西 太原 030006； 3.中国科学院过程工程研究所， 北京 100190； 4.中国科学院大学， 北京 100049

引用格式：

张乐， 赵宁， 褚浩然， 等. 磁约束聚变装置放射性粉尘研究进展［J］. 中国粉体技术， 2027， 33（1）： 1-14.

Zhang Le， Zhao Ning， Chu Haoran， et al. Research progress on radioactive dust in magnetic confinement fusion devices［J］. China Powder Science and Technology， 2027， 33（1）： 1-14.

DOI：10.13732/j.issn.1008-5548.2027.01.006

收稿日期： 2026-06-07， 修回日期： 2026-07-18， 上线日期： 2026-09-08。

基金项目： 国家重点研发项目，编号：2022YFC3702800。

第一作者： 张乐（1995—），男，助理研究员，博士，研究方向为放射性废物处理技术。E-mail：lezhang95@163.com。

通信作者： 陈运法（1965—），男，研究员，博士，博士生导师，研究方向为纳米功能材料与大气污染控制。E-mail：chenyf@ipe.ac.cn。

摘要： 【目的】 为了明确磁约束聚变装置放射性粉尘的风险管控方向，支撑聚变堆工程化安全设计，对粉尘产生机制、理化性质、器壁相互作用及安全影响进行系统梳理，实现对聚变粉尘研究现状的全面掌握和关键技术瓶颈的精准识别。【研究现状】 综述磁约束聚变装置放射性粉尘的全球研究进展，概括等离子体溅射、沉积层剥落、异常工况热喷溅、单极电弧等核心产尘机制，总结碳基与全金属面向等离子体部件粉尘在形貌、粒径、磁性、氚滞留能力等方面的源项特征差异，阐明粉尘与器壁的3类碰撞动力学行为及逃逸电子诱导超高速撞击的损伤机制，评估粉尘对装置运行稳定性和核安全的多重危害。【结论与展望】指出现有研究存在源项数据多为停机离线采样、极端事故下多场耦合演化规律不明等短板；认为未来须聚焦原位监测技术研发、专用实验平台建设及多场耦合仿真模型构建，加快放射性粉尘处理技术攻关，完善聚变堆粉尘安全评价体系。

关键词： 核聚变； 托卡马克装置； 放射性粉尘； 等离子体； 核安全

Abstract

Significance Controlled nuclear fusion， particularly magnetic confinement tokamak deuterium-tritium fusion， has attracted substantial scientific and technological interest worldwide as a promising approach to addressing global energy challenges and achieving carbon neutrality goals. It not only offers abundant fuel resources derived from seawater， but also features inherent safety advantages， negligible greenhouse gas emissions， and limited generation of long-lived high-level radioactive waste. Specifically， the construction of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor （ITER） and the rapid development of Chinese devices such as EAST and HL-3 have created increasing demands for comprehensive safety assessment， operational reliability optimization， and radioactive waste management. Research on dust in fusion devices has been conducted for nearly four decades. The transition of tokamak devices from carbon-based to all-metal plasma-facing components （PFCs） and the construction of large-scale experimental facilities provide an ideal platform for in-depth investigation into dust generation， transport， and interaction mechanisms. Numerous studies have reported dust characterization in individual tokamaks based on post-shutdown sampling and post-mortem analysis. However， such fragmented studies cannot provide a unified understanding of dust behavior across different device configurations and operating conditions because they lack systematic cross-machine comparisons and real-time in situ measurements under the extreme high-temperature， high-vacuum， and high-radiation conditions inside fusion vacuum vessels. As an alternative， comprehensive review articles that integrate scattered experimental data， theoretical models， and safety assessments have become important tools for identifying research gaps and guiding future directions， thereby becoming an active research focus in the fusion safety community over the past decade.

Progress So far， the main dust generation mechanisms in magnetic confinement fusion devices， including plasma sputtering， deposition layer peeling， thermal splashing under abnormal plasma conditions， unipolar arcing， and gas-phase nucleation in edge plasmas， have been investigated. Sharpe et al. published a review on fusion dust， summarizing the early research results from JET and TFTR with carbon-based PFCs and reporting a dust median diameter of 0.76—100 μm and a tritium specific activity of up to 4.0×10¹⁰ Bq/g （Tab.1）. This marks the first systematic recognition of dust as a critical safety hazard that affects both operational performance and nuclear safety in fusion devices. Subsequently， different sampling techniques including vacuum sweeping， filter collection， and surface wiping have been applied in various tokamaks to investigate the influence of PFC materials， plasma parameters， and device geometry on dust properties. However， these early studies， limited by the carbon-based wall configurations characterized by extremely high dust production rates and severe tritium retention， cannot provide practical guidance for next-generation all-metal fusion reactors. The transition to metal-walled devices highlights the magnetic properties of metal dust and their profound implications for dust transport and collection （Fig.3）. Then， considerable efforts have been made to improve the understanding of dust-wall interaction mechanisms， including elastic-plastic collision dynamics， liquid metal droplet impacts， and hypervelocity impacts induced by runaway electrons. Ultra-high-resolution camera observations are used to capture three typical dust-wall collision trajectories and quantify energy dissipation coefficients under magnetized plasma conditions as shown in Fig.4（a）—（d）. Comprehensive characterization of dust generation in JET with the ITER-like wall （JET-ILW） demonstrates that the dust production rate decreases by two orders of magnitude compared to the previous carbon-based JET-C configuration， representing a major advance in source control of fusion dust. Subsequently， the cross-machine comparison approach is applied in multiple metal-walled devices to establish a universal database of dust properties.

Conclusions and Prospects The past four decades have witnessed significant progress in fusion device dust research， enabling the establishment of basic safety standards and dust inventory limits for ITER and other next-generation fusion reactors. Different mechanisms， including plasma sputtering， thermal splashing under edge-localized modes， and unipolar arcing， have been introduced into fusion safety analysis to demonstrate the source-term characteristics of radioactive dust. However， most existing studies have inherent limitations， such as heavy reliance on post-shutdown offline sampling， lack of real-time in situ monitoring data， and incomplete understanding of multi-field coupling evolution under extreme accident conditions. These limitations reduce the accuracy of probabilistic safety assessment and hinder the development of effective dust control and removal technologies as fusion devices move toward long-pulse， high-power operation， especially at the commercial reactor scale. Therefore， the development of integrated in situ dust monitoring systems and real-time active control strategies is expected to become an important direction for future research. In addition， the performance of current dust decontamination and treatment technologies remains insufficient to meet the stringent requirements of commercial fusion reactors and needs to be improved through the application of new materials and innovative designs. Parallel to the fundamental research on dust physics and plasma interactions， further extending the safety evaluation system to cover multi-component mixed dust and severe accident scenarios such as loss-of-coolant accident （LOCA） is also an important research direction.

Keywords： nuclear fusion； Tokamak device； radioactive dust； plasma； nuclear safety

参考文献（References）

［1］崔静. 广角［J］. 华北电业， 2026（4）： 4.

‎Cui Jing. Wide angle［J］. North China Power， 2026（4）： 4.

［2］曾正魁， 陈思泽， 余慧莺， 等. 基于中国聚变工程试验堆的双功能液态铅锂包层活化分析和废物处理［J］. 辐射研究与辐射工艺学报， 2021， 39（6）： 55-62.

Zeng Zhengkui， Chen Size， Yu Huiying， et al. Activation analysis and waste management for dual functional lithium-lead blanket of the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor［J］. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing， 2021，39（6）： 55-62.

［3］周冰， 许莹. 核聚变能研究进展与工程化安全挑战［J］. 环境保护， 2025， 53（23）： 32-35.

Zhou Bing， Xu Ying. Research progress and engineering safety challenges in nuclear fusion energy［J］. Environmental Protection， 2025， 53（23）： 32-35.

［4］韩全. 大型聚变装置极向场磁体电流传输线关键技术研究［D］. 合肥： 中国科学技术大学， 2025： 1.

Han Quan. Research on key technology of current feeder of polar field magnet in large fusion device［D］. Hefei：University of Science and Technology of China， 2025：1.

［5］王园丁， 夏启蒙， 王一霖， 等. 空间核聚变推进技术的研究进展与发展建议［J］. 推进技术， 2025， 46（12）： 47-63.

Wang Yuanding， Xia Qimeng， Wang Yilin， et al. Development and prospects of in-space nuclear fusion propulsion［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2025， 46（12）： 47-63.

［6］郑欣， 韩皓南. 大力推进核能“三步走”发展战略［J］. 中国核工业， 2024（4）： 22-23.

Zheng Xin， Han Haonan. Vigorously advance the three-step development strategy for nuclear energy［J］. China Nuclear Industry， 2024（4）： 22-23.

［7］段旭如， 钟武律， 薛雷. 磁约束核聚变能研究进展与展望［J］. 核科学与工程， 2024， 44（5）： 989-994.

Duan Xuru， Zhong Wulyu， Xue Lei. Advancement and prospective outlook on the magnetic confinement fusion energy［J］. Nuclear Science and Engineering， 2025， 53（23）： 32-35.

［8］许晓敏， 满明铭. “双碳”背景下可控核聚变发展对策研究［J］. 新经济导刊， 2025（11）： 45-50.

Xu Xiaomin， Man Minming. Research on development countermeasures of controlled nuclear fusion under the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals［J］. New Economy Leader， 2025（11）： 45-50.

［9］戴羽. 对直接驱动激光聚变烧蚀与加热过程的X射线诊断［D］. 北京： 中国科学院大学（中国科学院物理研究所），2025： 1.

Dai Yu. X-ray diagnosis of direct drive laser fusion ablation and heating processes［D］. Beijing：University of Chinese Academy of Sciences （Institute of Physics， Chinese Academy of Sciences）， 2025：1.

［10］李正吉， 陈伟， 郝广周， 等. HL-3装置高聚变三乘积运行方案设计［J］. 物理学报， 2026， 75（8）： 64-76.

Li Zhengji， Chen Wei， Hao Guangzhou， et al. Design of operational scenarios for high fusion triple product in the HL-3 tokamak［J］. Acta Physica Sinica， 2026， 75（8）： 64-76.

［11］张彦杰. HL-3偏滤器脱靶和ITER钨限制器杂质输运的模拟研究［D］. 大连： 大连理工大学， 2025： 2.

Zhang Yanjie. Modeling study of divertor detachment in HL-3 and impurity transport in the ITER tungsten limiter［D］. Dalian： Dalian University of Technology， 2025： 2.

［12］Ongena J， Koch R， Wolf R， et al. Magnetic-confinement fusion［J］. Nature Physics， 2016， 12（5）： 398-410.

［13］Bucalossi J， Achard J， Agullo O， et al. Operating a full tungsten actively cooled tokamak： overview of WEST first phase of operation［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2022， 62（4）： 042007.

［14］钟武律，肖国梁，佟瑞海，等.磁约束核聚变托卡马克装置研究进展与展望［J］.原子能科学技术，2024，58（增刊2）：296-307.

Zhong Wulyu，Xiao Guoliang，Tong Ruihai，et al.Progress and prospect in magnetic confinement fusion research of Tokamak［J］. Atomic Energy Science and Technology， 2024， 58（S2）： 296-307.

［15］王哲， 龙婷， 孙爱萍， 等. HL-3托卡马克中性束加热功率影响H模等离子体约束性能的模拟［J］. 原子能科学技术，2025， 59（S2）： 311-319.

Wang Zhe， Long Ting， Sun Aiping， et al. Simulation on impact of neutral beam heating power on confinement performance of H-mode plasmas in HL-3 Tokamak［J］. Atomic Energy Science and Technology， 2025， 59（S2）： 311-319.

［16］杨军， 孙培杰， 彭翠婷， 等. 世界核能科技发展前沿进展［J］. 科技导报， 2024， 42（23）： 7-30.

Yang Jun， Sun Peijie， Peng Cuiting， et al. Frontier progress in global nuclear science and technology［J］. Science & Tech-nology Review， 2024， 42（23）： 7-30.

［17］蒋婧， 徐春艳， 张庆召， 等. 聚变装置放射性废物产生情况和管理策略初探［J］. 核安全， 2025， 24（2）： 14-22.

Jiang Jing， Xu Chunyan， Zhang Qingzhao， et al. A preliminary exploration on radioactive waste generation and management strategies in fusion devices［J］. Nuclear Safety， 2025， 24（2）： 14-22.

［18］Sharpe J P， Petti D A， Bartels H W. A review of dust in fusion devices：implications for safety and operational performance［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design， 2002， 63/64： 153-163.

［19］Shimada M， Pitts R A， Ciattaglia S， et al. In-vessel dust and tritium control strategy in ITER［J］. Journal of Nuclear Materials， 2013， 438： S996-S1000.

［20］Krasheninnikov S I， Smirnov R D， Rudakov D L. Dust in magnetic fusion devices［J］. Plasma Physica Control Fusion， 2011，53： 083001.

［21］Winter J. Dust： a new challenge in nuclear fusion research［J］. Physica Plasmas， 2000， 7： 3862-3866.

［22］Sharpe J P， Merrill B J， Petti D A， et al. Modeling of particulate production in the SIRENS plasma disruption simulator［J］.Journal of Nuclear Materials， 2001， 290/291/292/293： 1128-1133.

［23］Hassanein A， Konkaskbaev I. Macroscopic erosion of plasma facing and nearby components during plasma instabilities： the droplet shielding phenomena［J］. Journal of Nuclear Materials， 2001， 290/291/292/293： 1074-1078.

［24］Federici G， Skinner C H， Brooks J N， et al. Plasma-material interactions in current tokamaks and their implications for next step fusion reactors［J］. Nuclear. Fusion， 2001， 41： 1967-2137.

［25］Whyte D G，Coad J P，Franzen P， et al. Similarities in divertor erosion/redeposition and deuterium retention patterns between the tokamaks ASDEX Upgrade， DIII-D and JET［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2002， 39： 1025-1029.

［26］Fortuna-Zaleśna E， Plocinski T， Moon S W， et al. Dust generation and accumulation in JET-ILW： morphology and stability of co-deposits on main plasma-facing components and wall probes［J］. Physica Scripta， 2021， 96： 124038.

［27］De Angeli M， Tolias P， Conti C， et al. Cross machine investigation of magnetic tokamak dust：structural and magnetic ana-lysis［J］. Nuclear Materials and Energy， 2021， 28： 101045.

［28］De Angeli M， Ripamonti D， Ghezzi F， et al. Cross machine investigation of magnetic tokamak dust： morphological and elemental analysis［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design，2021， 166： 112315.

［29］Ratynskaia S， Bortolon A， Krasheninnikov S I. Dust and powder in fusion plasmas： recent developments in theory， modeling， and experiments［J］. Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics， 2022， 6： 20.

［30］Balden M， Endstrasser N， Humrickhouse P W， et al. Collection strategy， inner morphology， and size distribution of dust particles in ASDEX Upgrade［J］. Nuclear Fusion，2014， 54： 073010.

［31］Neu R， Angioni C， Bobkov V， et al. Review on ASDEX Upgrade operation with tungsten plasma facing components［J］. Nuclear Materials and Energy， 2026， 46： 102063.

［32］Brochard F， Shalpegin A， Bardin S， et al. Video analysis of dust events in full-tungsten ASDEX Upgrade［J］. Nuclear Fusion，2017， 57（3）： 036002.

［33］Rubel M， Widdowson A， Grzonka J， et al. Dust generation in tokamaks： overview of beryllium and tungsten dust characteriation in JET with the ITER-like wall［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design， 2018， 136： 579-586.

［34］Gheorghe D， Cristina C， Silviu D S， et al. Tungsten molecular species in deuterium plasmas in contact with sputtered W surfaces［J］. Molecules， 2024， 29：3539.

［35］Stankevich V G， Svechnikov N Y， Kolbasov B N. Comparative analysis of spectroscopic studies of tungsten and carbon deposits on plasma-facing components in thermonuclear fusion reactors［J］. Symmetry， 2023， 15（3）： 623.

［36］Peillon S， Dougniaux G， Payet M， et al. Dust sampling in WEST and tritium retention in tokamak-relevant tungsten particles［J］. Nuclear Materials and Energy， 2020， 24： 100781.

［37］Rohde V， Balden M， Lunt T， et al. Dust investigations at ASDEX Upgrade［J］. Physica Scripta， 2009： 014024.

［38］Nelson N， Martin C， Arnas C， et al. Dust deposition on plasma-facing substrates extracted from the WEST Tokamak［J］. Nuclear Materials and Energy， 2026， 46： 102056.

［39］De Angeli M， Rohde V， Tolias P，et al.Post-mortem and in-situ investigations of magnetic dust in ASDEX Upgrade［J］. Nuclear Materials and Energy， 2023， 36： 101476.

［40］Ratynskaia S， Vignitchouk L， Tolias P. Modelling of dust generation， transport and remobilization in full-metal fusion reactors［J］. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion， 2022， 64（4）： 044004.

［41］Pan Hongyan， Yan Rong， Ding Rui，et al. Investigation on characteristics and origin of ferromagnetic dust in EAST［J］， Nuclear Fusion， 2025， 65（8）： 086010.

［42］Shalpegin A， Brochard F， Ratynskaia S， et al. Highly resolved measurements of dust motion in the sheath boundary of magnetized plasmas［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2015， 55： 112001.

［43］Vignitchouk L， Ratynskaia S， Pitts R A， et al. Simulations of liquid metal flows over plasma-facing component edges and application to beryllium melt events in JET［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2022， 62： 036016.

［44］Vignitchouk L， Ratynskaia S. Metallic droplet impact simulations on plasma-facing components［J］. Nuclear Materials and Energy， 2024， 41： 101748.

［45］Castaldo C， Ratynskaia S， Pericoli V， et al. Diagnostics of fast dust particles in Tokamak edge plasmas［J］. Nuclear Fusion，2007， 47： L5-L9.

［46］De Angeli M， Tolias P， Ratynskaia S， et al. Evidence for high-velocity solid dust generation induced by runaway electron impact in FTU［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2022， 63： 014001.

［47］Tolias P， De Angeli M， Ripamonti D， et al. Wall damage due to oblique high velocity dust impacts［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design， 2026， 225： 115675.

［48］Miriam I， Alessio P， Michele R， et al. Deposition of ITER vacuum vessel dust inside the pressure suppression system during a loss of coolant accident： experimental and numerical analyses［J］. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science， 2022， 8（4）： 042301.

［49］Rubel M，Cecconello M，Malmberg J A， et al. Dust particles in controlled fusion devices： morphology， observations in the plasma and influence on the plasma performance［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2001， 41： 1087.

［50］Murari A， Edlington T， Alfier A， et al. Innovative diagnostics for ITER physics addressed in JET［J］. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion， 2008， 50： 124043.

［51］Saito K， Mutoh T， Kumazawa R， et al. ICRF long-pulse discharge and interaction with a chamber wall and antennas in LHD［J］. Journal of Nuclear Materials， 2007， 363/364/365： 1323-1328.

［52］Buchner R M. Beryllium-associated diseases from a chemist’s point of view［J］. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B， 2020， 75（5）： 405-412.

［53］Gu Yangguang. Calculation of beryllium toxic factor for potential ecological risk evaluation： a case study［J］. Environmental Technology & Innovation， 2021， 21： 101361.

［54］Liang Kaiqi， Chen Zhibin， Qin Zhijie， et al. ASTEC simulation of dust resuspension behavior induced by LOCA in fusion reactors［J］. Journal of Fusion Energy， 2023， 42： 29.

［55］Qin Zhijie，Zhang Shichao，Wang Zhen，et al. Drag characteristics of micron-sized tungsten dust in high-Mach rarefied flow during in-vessel LOCA of fusion reactor with Maxwell slip/DSMC hybrid modeling［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2026， 66：026009.

［56］Luca B， Donato A， Rosa L F. Design methodology of multi-hole spargers to prevent steam coalescence at sub-atmospheric pressure［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design， 2024， 429： 113640.

［57］Liang Kaiqi， Chen Zhibin， Jiang Kui. OpenFOAM modelling of air ingress into the high vacuum for fusion reactor safety［J］. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer， 2024， 259： 108349.

［58］Jin Xuezhou， Wolfgang R. Preliminary accident analysis of the loss of vacuum in vacuum vessel for the European DEMO HCPB blanket concept［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2024， 64： 056038.

［59］Miriam I， Alessio P， Michele R， et al. Deposition of ITER vacuum vessel dust inside the pressure suppression system during a loss of coolant accident： experimental and numerical analyses［J］. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science， 2022， 8： 042301.

［60］Qin Zhijie， Zhang Shichao， Wang Zhen， et al. Highly under expanded helium jet and its effect on dust resuspension under in-vessel loss of coolant accident of fusion reactor［J］. Nuclear Fusion， 2022， 62： 106007.

［61］Guido M， Matteo D， Gianfranco C. Hydrogen explosion mitigation in DEMO vacuum vessel pressure suppression system using passive recombiners［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design， 2021， 171： 112713.

［62］McCarthy K A， Petti D A， Carmack W J， et al. The safety implications of Tokamak dust size and surface area［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design， 1998， 42（1/2）： 45-52.

［63］Lu Qiming， Wang Zhen， Zhang Shichao， et al. Dust explosion in fusion reactors： explosion characteristics and reaction mechanism of tungsten micro-powder［J］. Combustion and Flame，2023， 248： 112551.

［64］Chen Xi， Yu Xiaozhe， Zhang Zhenhua， et al. Experimental investigation and prediction model development for the minimum explosion concentration of tungsten dust in hydrogen environments［J］. Powder Technology， 2025， 453： 120685.

［65］Luca B， Donato A， Michele R， et al. Dust produced by plasma off normal event in the vacuum vessel： experimental analyses of the deposition inside the pressure suppression tank during a LOCA［J］. Fusion Engineering and Design， 2023， 190：113540.

［66］Lavinia G C， Maria A A， Tomy A， et al. In vitro analysis of the cytotoxic effect of two different sizes ITER-like tungsten nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts［J］. Heliyon， 2023， 9（3）： e13949.