引用格式：

李强， 王登可， 谢竞生， 等. 燃烧调节剂对高能固体推进剂高压燃烧性能的影响机制［J］. 中国粉体技术， 2026， 32（1）： 1-11.

LI Qiang， XIE Jingsheng， WANG Dengke， et al. Influencing mechanism of burning rate regulators on high-pressure combustion performance of high-energy solid propellants［J］. China Powder Science and Technology， 2026， 32（1）： 1-11.

DOI：10.13732/j.issn.1008-5548.2026.01.017

收稿日期： 2025-06-05， 修回日期： 2025-06-12， 上线日期： 2025-06-26。

基金项目： 国家国防科技工业局基础性JG科研院所稳定支持计划； 内蒙自然科学基金项目，编号 ：2021BS05014。

第一作者简介： 李强（1992—），男，高级工程师，博士，硕士生导师，研究方向为含能材料燃烧性能调控。E-mail：1499175325@qq.com。

摘要： 【目的】 探讨适用于高能固体推进剂高压燃烧性能调控的燃烧调节剂的设计与催化机制，解决高能推进剂在高压强型号发动机中的应用问题。【方法】 采用高压四视透明窗结合高时空分辨彩色高速摄影技术，开展含铜燃烧速率调节剂（copper-containing burning rate regulator， CuL1）对高能固体推进剂高压燃烧性能的影响规律、推进剂火焰结构、燃烧温度及分布、凝相粒子分布的作用机制研究；采用MATLAB软件进行火焰图像处理，获得推进剂温度场重构模型。【结果】 燃烧调节剂CuL1能够降低硝胺热分解温度，提高推进剂燃温，增强火焰温度场与凝聚相粒子分布的均匀度，使得高能硝酸酯增塑聚醚（nitrate ester plasticized polyether， NEPE）推进剂高压10~16 MPa燃速压强指数由0.69减小至0.58。【结论】 提出开发具有燃烧调节作用的高效燃烧调节剂利于对高能推进剂高压燃烧性能调控；开展推进剂燃烧微观与分子级尺度的研究，能够揭示更多推进剂燃烧与氧化还原反应的内在规律。

关键词： 高能推进剂； 高压燃烧机制； 燃烧调节剂； 火焰结构； 温度场分布

Abstract 

Objective China still lags behind other military powers in the application of high-pressure， high-energy propellants in rocket motors. This is primarily due to the insufficient depth and systematization in fundamental theoretical research， an incomplete understanding of the high-pressure combustion mechanisms of high-energy propellants， and limited methods for controlling their combustion characteristics under high-pressure conditions. In this paper， the combustion mechanisms of high-energy nitrate ester plasticized polyether （NEPE） propellants are investigated using advanced technical approaches， including high-pressure closed vessel tests， high-speed imaging， spectral testing， and energy calculations. It aims to reveal the regulatory mechanisms of burning rate regulators on the combustion performance of high-energy propellants and to provide technical support for their application in high-pressure solid rocket motors.

Methods A high-pressure chamber with four transparent windows was used， combined with high-speed color photography with high spatiotemporal resolution， to investigate the influence of copper-containing burning rate regulator （CuL1） on the high-pressure combustion performance， flame structure， temperature distribution， and condensed-phase particle distribution of the propellants. MATLAB software was used for flame image processing， and a reconstructed model of the propellant temperature field was obtained.

Results and Discussion The high-energy NEPE propellant used polyethylene glycol （PEG） as the binder， ammonium perchlorate （AP） and nitramine explosive （RDX） as oxidants， aluminum powder as fuel， and nitroglycerin （NG） and 1，2，4-butanetriol trinitrate （BTTN） as plasticizers. The propellant was produced using a vertical mixer and subsequently solidified. Compared to hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene （HTPB） propellants， NEPE formulations exhibited higher burning rates and pressure exponents， primarily due to the slow decomposition of oxidants at low pressure. If the decomposition rate of oxidants under low-pressure conditions could be increased， thereby enhancing the burning rate at low pressure， the overall pressure exponent could be reduced. When doping with 1% CuL1， the decomposition peak of AP dropped from 444.7 ℃ to 339.1 ℃， a decrease of 105.6 ℃. CuL1 also catalyzed the decomposition of RDX， reducing its peak from 240.8 ℃ to 218.6 ℃， a decrease of 22.2 ℃. Consequently， the decomposition rate of oxidants increased， enhancing flame brightness near the burning surface. Without a burning rate regulator， the catalytic process relied on increasing pressure to enhance thermal feedback from the flame to the burning surface， thereby accelerating oxidant decomposition. Within the range of 1~5 MPa， the gas-phase temperature near the burning surface was consistently higher for CuL1-doped propellants， indicating more intense heat released due to enhanced oxidant decomposition. As pressure increased from 0 MPa to 15 MPa， the flame height of CuL1-containing propellant decreased slightly with a slope of 0.692 0. In contrast， the propellant without a burning rate regulator had a higher pressure exponent， and the flame height was more significantly affected by pressure， with a slope of 0.992 7. Aluminum powder underwent ignition， melting， and combustion stages. CuL1 accelerated oxidant decomposition near the burning surface， shortening the ignition-to-melting process. This led to the orderly formation of condensed-phase particles before large droplets could form， improving particle size uniformity and combustion stability. Without CuL1， the propellant aluminum powder ignited upon heating near the burning surface， resulting in significant agglomeration and a broad distribution of particle sizes. During the combustion process of CuL1-doped propellants， aluminum powder was ejected from the burning surface. Due to the high oxidant concentration near the burning surface， the melting process was shortened， facilitating the rapid formation of condensed-phase particles after ignition， resulting in relatively uniform particle sizes. This improved the particle size distribution in the combustion chamber， reducing heat accumulation caused by aluminum powder agglomeration and thereby enhancing propellant combustion stability. When CuL1 was doped， aluminum powder agglomeration was effectively controlled， thermal accumulation was suppressed， and the temperature distribution near the burning surface and in the gas-phase region was relatively more uniform. The maximum temperature reached 2 718 K. The energy barrier for the decomposition of NH₃ into NH₂*+H* decreased from 1.84 eV to -0.89 eV， and the energy barrier for its further decomposition into NH*+H* decreased from 2.64 eV to 1.52 eV.

Conclusion The continuous development of highly efficient burning rate regulators is conducive to regulating the high-pressure combustion performance of high-energy propellants. Conducting research on propellant combustion at microscopic and molecular scales can reveal more inherent mechanisms controlling propellant combustion and redox reactions.

Keywords： high-energy propellant； mechanism of high-pressure combustion； burning rate regulator； flame structure； temperature field distribution

参考文献（References）

［1］GLASSMAN L. Combustion of metals， physical considerations［M］. New York： Progress in Astronautics and Rocketry， 1960：253-258.

［2］LIU J N， LI M M. Research progress on high combustion performance of aluminum based fuel in solid propellant［J］. Aerospace Shanghai， 2019， 36： 1-6.

［3］ZHANG X P， LI B X. Study on combustion characteristics of NEPE propellant at high pressure［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2008， 29（4）： 508-512.

［4］WANG Y， SUN Z H. Study on combustion mechanism of NEPE propellant［J］. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants，2000， 4： 24-26.

［5］ZHANG X P. Effects of composite burning-rate modifiers on combustion properties of NEPE propellant under high pressure［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2007， 30（2）： 128-131.

［6］赵海， 罗桂莲， 史良伟， 等. 丁羟三组元推进剂15~60 MPa高压燃烧特性研究［J］.固体火箭技术， 2021， 44（6）： 806-810.

ZHAO H， LUO G L， SHI L W， et al. Research on the high-pressure combustion characteristics of tricomponent butylhydroxyl propellant at 15~60 MPa ［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2021， 44（6）： 806-810.

［7］胡松启， 李葆萱， 李逢春， 等. 高压强下推进剂燃速特性初步分析［C］//中国宇航学会.上海：中国宇航学会固体火箭推进专业委员会第二十一届年会， 2004.

HU S Q， LI B X， LI F C， et al. Preliminary analysis of propellant burning rate characteristics under high pressure［C］// The Chinese Society of AstronauticsShanghai： The 21st Annual Conference of the Solid Rocket Propulsion Professional Committee of the Chinese Society of Astronautics， 2004.

［8］WU H M，CHEN L Q. Analysis of energy characteristics of hydrogen storage metal materials used in high energy solid propellant［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2020， 43（6）： 707-713.

［9］FAN S F，LI Y J， LI J Q， et al. Analysis of energy characteristics of azide-based solid propellants containing ADN or TKX-50［J］. Explosive Materials， 2019， 48（5）： 12-18.

［10］ZHANG X P， LI B X， WANG Y， et al. Study on combustion characteristics of NEPE propellant at high pressure［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2008， 29（4）： 508-512.

［11］MAGGI F， BANDERA A， LUCA T L. Approaching solid propellant heterogeneity for agglomerate size prediction［C］//The 46th AIAA/ ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference ＆ Exhibit， Nashville， TN， July 25-28， 2010．

［12］TAKAHASHI K， OIDE S， KUWAHARA T. Agglomeration characteristics of aluminum particles in AP/AN composite propellants［J］. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics， 2013， 38（4）： 555-562．

［13］WANG H M， CHEN X， ZHAO C. NEPE propellant ignition and combustion under laser irradiation［J］. Advanced Materials Research， 2014， 1042（10）： 10-14.

［14］JIN S H， KIM G S. Simultaneous measurements of burning velocity and temperature distribution of combustion using UV laser Rayleigh scattering［J］. Measurement， 2021， 169： 108505.

［15］YANG B，GUO H R，GUI X Y， et al. On-line combustion temperature measurements of solid rocket propellant by using radiation spectroscopy［J］. Spectroscopy and Sectral Aalysis， 2018， 38（6）： 1958-1962.

［16］CAI X S， ZHOU W， YANG H， et al. Research advances in the in-line measurement techniques for combustion and flow field［J］. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 28（1）： 12-20.

［17］ZHANG X P. Effects of composite burning rate modifiers on combustion properties of NEPE propellant under high pressure［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2007， 30（2）： 128-131.

［18］TANG Q， PANG A M. Research progress analysis of aluminum combustion property and mechanism of solid propellant［J］.Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2015， 38（2）： 232-238.

［19］ZHU Y M， LYU D. Parameter control and engineering optimization of continuous mixing process of solid propellant［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology，2020， 43（6）： 776-781.

［20］XIN K， YANG K R， HUO Z. Research progress on high-pressure combustion performance of NEPE propellant［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2021， 276： 611-638.

［21］WANG F， ZHANG X P， HU R Z， et al. Study on combustion properties of nitrate ester plasticized polyether propellants at high pressure［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2004， 25（5）： 469-472.

［22］LI Y C， HE G Q. Experimental study on effects of particle erosion on combustion property of HTPB propellant［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2007， 30（6）： 552-555.

［23］WANG H X， LI Q ， REN H. AP assembled on ultrafine aluminum particle and its application to NEPE propellant［J］. Defence Technology， 2024， 36： 20-29.

［24］CURTIS D D. Control of processibility by particle size in high energy solid propellant： US P4 693 764 ［P］.1986-09-18.

［25］GU J， ZHANG X P. Influence of new loading burning-rate catalysts on burning-rate of NEPE propellants［J］. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants. 2015， 38（5）： 79-86.