收稿日期:2024-05-22,修回日期:2024-07-07,上线日期:2024-09-30。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目,编号:52069025;宁夏自然科学基金重点项目,编号:2023AAC02025。
第一作者简介:周志尧(2001—),男,硕士生,研究方向为盐渍土固化。E-mail:zzy011701@163. com。
通信作者简介:李宏波(1977—),男,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为土木工程新材料。E-mail:lihongbo@126. com。
摘要:【目的】 解决宁夏地区盐渍土地基在盐-冻胀和盐腐蚀作用下存在显著的强度劣化问题,利用固废材料替代部分水泥固化盐渍土,提高固废资源利用率的同时大幅改善盐渍土地基的抗压和抗剪性能。【方法】 采用水泥、粉煤灰、硅灰和砖粉作为固化剂,基于正交试验方案开展无侧限抗压强度试验和三轴剪切试验,并通过X射线衍射和扫描电子显微镜2种微观表征手段,研究不同固化剂用量对盐渍土无侧限抗压强度和抗剪强度的影响规律,从而确定较优的盐渍土固化组合。【结果】 水泥和硅灰会大幅提高固化盐渍土的无侧限抗压强度,而粉煤灰用量的增加会使固化盐渍土的强度呈现先增后减的变化趋势,砖粉的潜在火山灰活性较难激发,需要水泥的水化反应为其提供碱性环境。4种固化剂影响固化盐渍土强度的主次顺序为水泥、粉煤灰、硅灰、砖粉。【结论】 水泥、粉煤灰、硅灰和砖粉质量分数分别为3%、5%、5%和6%时固化效果最佳。固化盐渍土强度主要受水化硅酸钙、水化铝酸钙、钙矾石等晶体的相互作用,导致土颗粒中晶体和胶凝物的分布从单个和细小的团簇转变为更复杂的三维网络结构,增强了土颗粒、盐分和胶凝物之间的结合力。
关键词:固化盐渍土;无侧限抗压强度;力学性能;微观分析
Objective The saline soil foundation in the Ningxia region experiences significant strength deterioration due to salt-frost heave and salt corrosion. This poses a substantial threat to buildings and infrastructure. To address this, researchers have proposed a novel approach that utilizes solid waste to partially replace cement in stabilizing saline soil. This method not only promotes the use of solid waste resources but also significantly improves the compressive and shear resistance of the saline soil foundation. By addressing both environmental and structural concerns, this approach presents a sustainable solution to the challenges posed by saline soil in Ningxia.
Methods This study investigated the use of various curing agents, including cement, fly ash, silica fume, and brick powder,for stabilizing saline soil. To assess the effectiveness of these materials, unconfined compressive strength and triaxial shear tests were conducted based on an orthogonal test scheme. This comprehensive testing approach ensured that the effects of different curing agent contents on the unconfined compressive strength and shear strength of saline soil were thoroughly analyzed.Advanced techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were employed to examine the microstructural changes in the soil samples. These analyses provided detailed insights into the optimal curing combination for enhancing the properties of saline soil.
Results and Discussion The research investigated the impact of various admixtures on the unconfined compressive strength of solidified saline soil. The findings revealed that cement and silica fume significantly enhanced the unconfined compressive strength of the treated saline soil. Cement, known for its strong binding properties, contributed to the formation of a robust matrix that effectively resisted compressive forces. The addition of silica fume, characterized by its fine particle size and high pozzolanic activity, acted as a supplementary cementitious material, further strengthening the matrix and improving the overall strength. Silica fume enhanced the density and durability of the soil by filling voids and contributing to the formation of additional cementitious compounds. Fly ash exhibited a complex effect. Initially, an increase in strength was observed with increasing fly ash content, likely due to its pozzolanic activity and its contribution to the formation of additional cementitious compounds. However, beyond a certain point, further addition of fly ash led to a decrease in strength. This decline was possibly due to the dilution of the cement paste and the formation of weaker hydration products. This suggested that there was an optimal content of fly ash that maximizes its beneficial effects without compromising the overall strength of the soil. Brick powder, while possessing potential pozzolanic properties, required an alkaline environment provided by the hydration reaction of cement to activate its reactivity. Consequently, its contribution to the strength of solidified saline soil was limited compared to the other admixtures. The study found that brick powder, although beneficial in certain contexts, did not perform as effectively as cement, fly ash, or silica fume in enhancing the strength of the soil. Overall, the effectiveness of the four curing agents in enhancing the strength of cured saline soil followed the order: cement > fly ash > silica fume > brick powder. This ranking reflected the varying degrees of pozzolanic activity, binding capacity, and reactivity of each admixture in the context of solidified saline soil. These insights are crucial for developing effective soil stabilization strategies.
Conclusion The optimal composition for cement-based materials used to stabilize saline soil was found to be 3% cement,5% fly ash,5% silica fume, and 6% brick powder. This specific composition significantly enhances the strength of the solidified saline soil through the interaction of various crystalline compounds, including calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), calcium aluminate hydrate (C-A-H), and ettringite. These crystals, through their interconnectivity, contribute to a transformation in the soil’s structure. Initially, soil particles exist as individual units or small clusters. The introduction of these crystals facilitates the development of a more complex, three-dimensional network structure. This interconnected network enhances the adhesion between soil particles, salts, and the gelled substances present in the cement-based material. The findings of this research provide valuable insights for the design of cement-based materials, specifically tailored for curing saline soil. Understanding the optimal composition and the underlying mechanisms of strength enhancement paves the way for more effective and durable soil stabilization solutions. This study not only addresses the immediate challenge of strengthening saline soil foundations but also contributes to the broader goal of sustainable construction practices. By promoting the use of solid waste materials in soil stabilization, this research supports environmental sustainability while ensuring the safety and durability of infrastructure in saline soil regions. The innovative approach outlined in this study represents a significant advancement in the field of soil stabilization and has the potential to be applied in other regions facing similar challenges.
Keywords:solidified saline soil; unconfined compressive strength; mechanical property; microscopic analysis
[1]徐鹏程,冷翔鹏,刘更森,等. 盐碱土改良利用研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2014,42(5):293-298.
XU P C, LENG X P, LIU G S, et al. Research progress in the improvement and utilization of saline alkali soil[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(5):293-298.
[2]李芳,李斌,陈建. 中国公路盐渍土的分区方案[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006(6):12-14,89.
LI F, LI B, CHENG J. Zoning scheme of highway saline soil in China[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2006(6):12-14,89.
[3]李宏波,李盛,于广云,等. 盐渍土固化强度及冻融特性试验研究[J/OL]. 工程科学与技术:1-16[2024-04-27].https://doi. org/10. 15961/j. jsuese. 202300221.
LI H B, LI S, YU G Y, et al. Experimental study on curing strength and freeze-thaw characteristics of saline soil[J/OL].Engineering Science and Technology:1-16[2024-04-27]. https://doi. org/10. 15961/j. jsuese. 202300221.
[4]李敏,于禾苗,杜红普,等. 冻融循环对二灰和改性聚乙烯醇固化盐渍土力学性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学,2022,43(2):489-498.
LI M, YU H M, DU H P, et al. Effect of freeze-thaw cycle on mechanical properties of salt-soil cured by ash and modified polyvinyl alcohol[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2022,43(2):489-498.
[5]谢宇轩,朱连勇,王立成 . 工业及建筑废弃物对固化盐渍土的力学性能和路用性能影响[J]. 科学技术与工程,2023,23(19):8393-8401.
XIE Y X, ZHU L Y, WANG L C. Influence of mechanical properties and road performance of industrial and construction waste solidified saline soil[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2023,23(19):8393-8401.
[6]宫经伟,林浩然,王亮,等. 基于正交试验的全固废复合胶凝材料固化盐渍土的力学性能[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(7):2865-2872.
GONG J W, LING H R, WANG L, et al. Mechanical properties of solid waste composite cementitious material curing saline soil based on orthogonal test[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(7):2865-2872.
[7]SHEN Y, LI P, JING P, et al. Experiment and mechanism analysis on the solidification of saline dredger fill with composite slag solidifying agent: a case study in Caofeidian, China[J]. Applied Sciences,2022,12(4):1849.
[8]LIU C B. Research on strength and microstructure feature of solidified saline soil in inshore with slag cementitious material[J].Applied Mechanics and Materials,2012,174:1232-1237.
[9]丁永发,李宏波,张轩硕,等. 工业废渣协同水泥固化渠道地基盐渍土强度及微观机理研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2022,41(6):113-120.
DING Y F, LI H B, ZHANG X S, et al. Study on strength and microscopic mechanism of saline soil in channel foundation solidified by industrial waste and cement[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2022,41(6):113-120.
[10]樊丽琴,杨建国. 工业废弃物在盐碱地改良中的应用研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学,2012,41(1):21-24.
FAN L Q, YANG J G. Research progress on the application of industrial waste to saline-alkali land improvement[J]. HenanAgricultural Science,2012,41(1):21-24.
[11]李敏,王宸,杜红普,等. 石灰粉煤灰联合固化石油污染滨海盐渍土的力学特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(增刊1):3578-3586.
LI M, WANG C, DU H P, et al. Mechanical properties of oil-contaminated coastal saline soil solidified by lime-fly ash[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2017,36(S1):3578-3586.
[12]周琦,邓安,韩文峰,等. 固化滨海盐渍土耐久性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2007(6):1129-1132.
ZHOU Q, DENG A, HAN W F, et al. Experimental study on durability of solidified coastal saline soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2007(6):1129-1132.
[13]王一名,常立君,李滢. 废弃混凝土再生微粉固化盐渍土的强度特性及微观机理研究[J]. 材料导报,2021,35(增刊2):268-274.
WANG Y M, CHANG L J, LI Y. Study on strength characteristics and microscopic mechanism of recycled concrete curing saline soil[J]. Materials Review,2021,35(S2):268-274.
[14]李舒洁,常立君. 再生微粉固化黄土状盐渍土的力学特性和微观机理[J]. 中国粉体技术,2022,28(5):30-39.
LI S J, CHANG L J. Mechanical properties and microscopic mechanism of regenerated micro-powder solidified loess-like saline soil[J]. China Powder Science and Technology,2022,28(5):30-39.
[15]柴寿喜,张琳,魏丽,等. 冻融作用下纤维加筋固化盐渍土的抗压性能与微观结构[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2022,49(5):96-105.
CHAI S X, ZHANG L, WEI L, et al. Compressive properties and microstructure of fiber reinforced cured saline soil under freeze-thaw action[J]. Hydrogeology Engineering Geology,2022,49(5):96-105.
[16]柴寿喜,田萌萌,魏丽,等. 石灰粉煤灰固化硫酸盐渍土的水稳定性与微观结构特征[J]. 工程地质学报,2024,32(2):430-439.
CHAI S X, TIAN M M, WEI L, et al. Water stability and microstructure characteristics of lime-fly ash solidified sulphate soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2024,32(2):430-439.
[17]柴寿喜,杨宝珠,王晓燕,等 . 含盐量对石灰固化滨海盐渍土力学强度影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2008(7):1769-1772,1777.
CHAI S X, YANG B Z, WANG X Y, et al. Experimental study on effect of salt content on mechanical strength of lime-solidified coastal saline soil[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2008(7):1769-1772,1777.
[18]魏丽,杨光,尚军,等. 冻融损伤过程中纤维加筋土的抗压性能与裂隙演化[J]. 土木工程学报,2024,57(4):81-91.
WEI L, YANG G, SHANG J, et al. Compressive properties and crack evolution of fiber reinforced soil during freeze-thaw damage[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering,2024,57(4):81-91.
[19]魏丽,柴寿喜. SH固土剂对滨海盐渍土的固化作用评价[J]. 工程地质学报,2018,26(2):407-415.
WEI L, CHAI S X. Evaluation of solidifying effect of SH solidifying agent on coastal saline soil[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2018,26(2):407-415.
[20]张立力,华苏东,诸华军,等. 高镁镍渣-磷石膏基胶凝材料固化和改良盐渍土的性能[J]. 材料导报,2020,34(9):9034-9040.
ZHANG L L, HUA S D, ZHU H J, et al. Curing and improving properties of saline soil with high magnesium nickel slag-phosphogypsum based cementing material[J]. Materials Reports,2020,34(9):9034-9040.
[21]王舒华,陈爽,王悦,等 . 有机改良剂配施磷石膏的盐碱土改良效果研究[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(11):227-233.
WANG S H, CHENG S, WANG Y, et al. Study on the improvement effect of organic amendment combined with phosphogypsum on saline-alkali soil[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2022,50(11):227-233.
[22]丑亚玲,韩航天. 稻壳灰改良盐渍土力学特性及抗冻性的研究[J]. 兰州理工大学学报,2023,49(1):127-135.
CHOU Y L, HAN H T. Study on mechanical properties and frost resistance of improved saline soil by rice husk ash[J].Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology,2023,49(1):127-135.
[23]戴文亭,刘德浩,司泽华,等. 稻壳灰纤维水泥改性盐渍土的力学性能研究与机理分析[J]. 公路工程,2022,47(3):137-142.
DAI W T, LIU D H, SI Z H, et al. Study on mechanical properties and mechanism analysis of rice husk ash fiber cement modified saline soil[J]. Highway Engineering,2022,47(3):137-142.
[24]李宏波,田军仓,南红兵,等. 几种固化剂对渠道盐渍土地基力学性能影响的试验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2018,37(12):94-99.
LI H B, TIAN J C, NAN H B, et al. Experimental study on the influence of several solidifying agents on the mechanical properties of saline soil foundation in channels[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2018,37(12):94-99.
[25]杨晓松,刘井强,党进谦. 粉煤灰改良氯盐渍土工程特性试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2012,29(11):82-86.
YANG X S, LIU J Q, DANG J L. Experimental study on engineering characteristics of chlorinated saline soil improved by fly ash[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute,2012,29(11):82-86.
[26]邢国起,张立君,李香美,等 . S105 矿粉替代复合硅酸盐水泥固化盐碱土试验及机理研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2022,53(7):180-190.
XING G Q, ZHANG L J, LI X M, et al. Experiment and mechanism study of S105 mineral powder instead of composite Portland cement curing saline-alkali soil[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2022,53(7):180-190.
[27]孙宏强. 三种固化剂对硫酸盐渍土的改良效果及机理研究[D]. 兰州:兰州理工大学,2023.
SUN H Q. Study on the improvement effect and mechanism of three curing agents on sulphate saline soil[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of Technology,2023.